Legal Opinion
Prysmian Cables and Systems USA LLC v. ADT Commercial LLC
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided March 30, 2023No. 3:22-cv-00836Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT PRYSMIAN CABLES & SYSTEMS USA LLC, Plaintiff, No. 3:22-cv-836 (VAB) v. ADT COMMERCIAL LLC, Defendant. RULING AND ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS Prysmian Cables and Systems USA LLC (“Prysmian” or “Plaintiff”) has sued its security system provider, ADT Commercial LLC (“ADT” or “Defendant”), alleging that Prysmian’s facility was burglarized after ADT disarmed Prysmian’s security system without informing Prysmian or receiving the required authorization from Prysmian employees. Compl. ¶¶ 3–4, ECF No. 1. Prysmian asserts claims for breach of…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Arista Records, LLC v. Doe 3Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- McCarthy v. Dun & Bradstreet Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- Bridgestone/firestone, Inc. v. Recovery Credit Services, Inc., Revenue Recovery, Inc. And George BeladinoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.