Legal Opinion
In re Christian W.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 27, 2011PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*1063The appellant’s challenge to the legal sufficiency of the evidence is unpreserved for appellate review (see Matter of Charles S., 41 AD3d 484 [2007]; cf CPL 470.05 [2]). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the presentment agency (see Matter of David H., 69 NY2d 792, 793 [1987]; Matter of Imani Mc., 78 AD3d 705, 706 [2010]), we find that the evidence was legally sufficient to support the finding that the appellant had committed an act which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crime of forcible touching (see Penal Law § 130.52). Moreover, in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. DanielsonNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
- Matter of H.New York Court of Appeals · 1987
- In re Hasan C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- In re Ashley P.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- In re Charles S.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re Friday M.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Matter of Skylar H.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016