Legal Opinion

Mercedes-Benz Credit Corp. v. Rhyne

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 12, 1996No. 95-0159PublishedCited by 270 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpector, Justice

In this case of first impression, we consider whether a trial court abuses its discretion by denying a jury trial to a litigant who had relied on the court’s order issued a year before the trial date setting the case on the jury docket. The court of appeals affirmed the trial court’s denial. See — S.W.2d-, -. We hold that the trial court abused its discretion, and we therefore reverse the judgment of the court of appeals and remand the ease to the trial court.

I

This case arose when the Mercedes-Benz Credit Corporation repossessed two trucks from Norman A. Rhyne, sold them, and then sued Rhyne…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Downer v. Aquamarine Operators, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Simon v. York Crane & Rigging Co., Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Halsell v. DehoyosTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Huddle v. HuddleTexas Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Higginbotham v. Collateral Protection, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1993

3Cited by270 opinions

  1. In Re Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Goode v. ShoukfehTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  3. G & H TOWING CO. v. MageeTexas Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Caldwell v. BarnesTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Howell v. Texas Workers' Compensation Commission, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2004

265 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API