Legal Opinion
Haycraft v. Adams
Utah Supreme Court
Decided August 3, 1933No. 5217PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MOFFAT, Justice.
The complaint in the case in this appeal contains two causes of action. Both sound in trespass, the parties have treated the first cause of action as one for conversion of furniture. The second is for trespass to realty at the time of the alleged conversion of the personal property referred to in the first cause of action.
Damages for the alleged conversion, damages for the alleged trespass, and punitive or exemplary damages are prayed for.
W. H. Adams, the defendant and appellant, is an auctioneer and furniture dealer. He has been engaged in such business in Salt Lake City for…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Hangen v. . HachemeisterNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Shea v. HudsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895
- Smith v. Mine & Smelter Supply Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1907
- Hawver v. . BellNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
- Sullivan v. LearSupreme Court of Florida · 1887
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. HatahleyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1958
- Nephi Processing Plant, Inc., a Corporation v. H. A. Talbott and Margaret TalbottCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1957
- Lowe v. RosenlofUtah Supreme Court · 1961
- State v. LudlowCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2015
- United States v. Bill HatahleyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1958