Legal Opinion

Crisp v. United States & Australasia S. S. Co.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 24, 1903PublishedCited by 7 opinions

In Admiralty. Action for charter hire.

1Opinion of the Court

ADAMS, District Judge.

This is an action which was brought by the libelant, as master of the S. S. Salfordia, to recover a balance of $2826.40 charter hire, alleged to be due to the owners of the steamer from the respondent, under a charter party, dated July 6th, 1900.

The charter party provided for a term of about six months. The steamer entered upon its performance at New York, on the 17th of *749August, 1900; and, having been loaded for Melbourne and Brisbane, was ordered by the charterer to proceed to Sydney, N. S. W., via Melbourne, where she arrived on the 6th of November, 1900, and reported…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Homer Ramsdell Transportation Co. v. La Compagnie Générale TransatlantiqueSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  2. Mencke v. Cargo of Java SugarSupreme Court of the United States · 1902

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Park S.S. Co., Limited v. Cities Service Oil CoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
  2. Fulton v. Wilmington Star Min. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1904
  3. Connecticut Fire Ins. v. Smith & Richards Lumber Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1939
  4. Cities Service Transp. Co. v. Gulf Refining Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1934
  5. North of England S. S. Co. v. Munson S. S. Co.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API