Legal Opinion

Fitts v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided October 29, 1935No. S. F. 15377; L. A. 14976Published

1Opinion of the Court

4 Cal.2d 514 (1935)

BURON FITTS et al., Petitioners,

v.

THE SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, Respondent.

S. F. No. 15377.

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

October 29, 1935.

Walter K. Tuller, Joseph Scott, Roland G. Swaffield, Jerry Giesler, Jack Gilchrist, Harold Judson, Byron C. Hanna and H. P. Bledsoe for Petitioners.

Everett W. Mattoon, County Counsel, S. V. O. Prichard, Deputy County Counsel, and Clyde C. Shoemaker, Special Counsel, for Respondent.

WASTE, C.J.

Petitioners seek writs of prohibition, directed to the respondent Superior Court, to stay further proceedings therein in…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Curtis; Concurrence · Seawell.

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. The People v. . PetreaNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  2. Bruner v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. In re GannonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  4. People v. LeonardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Holland v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API