Legal Opinion

Clark v. Pearson

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided December 20, 1965No. Civ. A. 710-62PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Holtzoff, District Judge.

This action for libel is before the Court on the defendants’ motions for summary judgment.

The plaintiff, Charles Patrick Clark, is a lawyer in active practice in Washington, D. C. One of his clients is the Government of Spain, from which he has been in receipt of a large annual retainer. Another client is a group of companies producing natural gas, whom the plaintiff represents in connection with legislative matters. The defendant, Drew Pearson, is a newspaper man, popularly known as a “columnist”, who periodically writes articles or “columns” that appear under his…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Cohens v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
  3. Barr v. MatteoSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  4. Howard v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  5. Washington Post Co. v. ChalonerSupreme Court of the United States · 1919

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Dunlap v. Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. Linus Pauling v. Globe-Democrat Publishing Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1966
  3. Hoffman v. Washington Post Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1977
  4. Ford Motor Credit Company v. HollandDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. Coughlin v. Westinghouse Broadcasting & Cable, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1985

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API