Legal Opinion
Meltsner v. Posmanick
City of New York Municipal Court
Decided May 1, 1950Published
1Opinion of the CourtLoreto, J.
The plaintiffs move herein to vacate the defendant’s demand for a bill of particulars addressed to the plaintiffs’ cause of action, which is stated to be an unpaid check executed *1057and delivered by the defendant to the plaintiffs. The items of the demand are:
“ 1. Was said check for $100.00 issued pursuant to terms of a written or oral agreement by defendant with plaintiffs?
“ 2. State the full terms of said contract, if written; state the substance thereof, if oral.
“ 3. State what work and materials were done and furnished by plaintiffs.”
In this court, “ oral ” pleadings are authorized by the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Du Pont Automobile Distributors, Inc. v. Du Pont Motors, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
- Townsend v. HalbertNew York Supreme Court · 1944