Legal Opinion

Ovitt v. Schumekosky

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 14, 1924PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJones, J.

This action was brought under sec. 3186 of the Statutes to quiet title, cancel a tax deed and other deeds, and to recover damages for trespass. No bill of exceptions was settled. On entering upon the trial the trial judge announced that the validity of the tax deed would be considered before the matter of improvements made by the defendant and his good faith would be taken up. Considerable *619testimony was taken, when the court made, among others, the following" interlocutory finding:

“The plaintiff, Ovitt, holds the record title to three certain descriptions of land which will be referred to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Raymond v. KesebergWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Motowski v. People's Dentists of WisconsinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Gill v. HermannWisconsin Supreme Court · 1919

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Szuszka v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Dombrowski v. TomasinoWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API