Legal Opinion

Richard Love, Jr. v. Frank McCray Superintendent of Livingston Correctional Facility

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided July 1, 2005No. Docket 03-2307-PRPublishedCited by 153 opinions

1Per curiam

We previously granted a certificate of appealability (“COA”) in this appeal by Richard Love, Jr., from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York (McAvoy, J.) that denied § 2254 habeas relief. Our order appointed counsel to brief the question whether the prosecutor in the underlying criminal case violated Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963), by withholding from the defense a composite sketch that reflected a description given by the victim but that (allegedly) does not resemble Love. Now, [i] appointed counsel has…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Pennsylvania v. FinleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by153 opinions

  1. Rubin v. GarvinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
  2. Rosario v. ErcoleDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
  3. Collier v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2021
  4. Kinte Graves v. Scott McEwenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  5. Pena v. LynchDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017

148 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API