Legal Opinion

Niles Bank Co. v. Evatt

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 25, 1945No. 29991, 29992, 29993 and 29994PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.

At the outset it should be made perfectly clear that the question of the taxability of the “hypothecated deposits” is not before the court. The Board of Tax Appeals found that such deposits were not taxable and no claim of error is predicated upon that finding.

The questions for decision in cases Nos. 29991 and 29992 as set forth by the appellant are as follows:

“Did the Board of Tax Appeals act illegally or abuse its discretion in making its determination that (1) the Tax Commissioner had jurisdiction to hear and grant the applications filed by the taxpayer on March 30, 1943, when the taxpayer…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Willys-Overland Motors, Inc. v. EvattOhio Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Ohio Bell Telephone Co. v. EvattOhio Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Leimbach v. EvattOhio Supreme Court · 1943

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Belgrade Gardens, Inc. v. KosydarOhio Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Chicago Freight Car Leasing Co. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Michelin Tire Corp. v. KosydarOhio Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. Ellsworth Freight Lines, Inc. v. BowersOhio Supreme Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API