Legal Opinion

United States v. Neil Virgil Coyle, United States of America v. Mark Edward Swedzinski

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided April 13, 1993No. 92-2300, 92-2630PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHN R. GIBSON, Circuit Judge.

Coyle and Swedzinski appeal their convictions for aiding and abetting and conspiracy to grow marijuana. Swedzinski also appeals his conviction for carrying a firearm in relation to the drug offense. Coyle raises an insufficiency of evidence argument and Swedzinski argues that the district court 1 erred in refusing to instruct the jury on intent. We affirm the convictions.

On September 20, 1991, agents of the Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension discovered a plot of cultivated marijuana in Lincoln County, Minnesota. The agents placed the area under…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. United States v. Nelson BellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
  4. Bell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. United States v. Leo Plenty Arrows, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mark Edward Swedzinski v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
  2. Mark E. Swedzinski v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API