State ex rel. London v. Ohio Pardon & Parole Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
Relator was returned to the Ohio Penitentiary in September 1963 as a parole violator. After his return thereto, he had a hearing before the commission, and his parole was revoked for the violation of four different rules of parole. Relator apparently is urging in his petition that he is entitled at his hearing on a violation of parole to all the rights accorded. an accused in his original trial, such as compulsory process to procure witnesses, counsel, etc. In other words, a complete judicial hearing.
The position of the parolee was thoroughly considered in In re Varner, 166 Ohio St. 340. See,…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Herbert E. Rose v. E. B. Haskins, SuperintendentCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
- People ex rel. Menechino v. WardenNew York Court of Appeals · 1971
- Januzzi v. HickmanOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- In Re 730 ChickensOhio Court of Appeals · 1991
- Rose v. HaskinsOhio Supreme Court · 1970
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.