Hosford v. Henry
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtVan Dyke, J.
The action here under review was brought by plaintiff-respondent, Hosford, against defendant-appellant, Henry, to obtain reformation of a deed of trust securing a promissory note given by appellant to respondent and to foreclose the deed of trust as reformed. Appellant for some time had been engaged in the business of operating a public utility furnishing electric light and power and a public utility furnishing water to the town of Klamath and vicinity in Del Norte County. His enterprises had been franchised by the Public Utilities Commission. On March 13, 1948, he borrowed from respondent…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Title Insurance & Trust Co. v. California Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
- Bailard v. MardenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Fong Chuck v. Chin Po FoonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Clement v. Reclamation BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Lyle v. LyleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
3Cited by13 opinions
- Tobin v. CasausCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Avery v. Associated Seed Growers, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1963
- People v. EastmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Johnson v. JohnsonArizona Supreme Court · 1969
- People Ex Rel. Pub. Utilities Comm'n v. City of FresnoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.