Legal Opinion

Garner v. Anderson

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1926No. 3472PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGideon, C. J.

The right to the use of the waters of a small mountain stream in Weber county is the subject of this litigation. The stream is known as Burch creek.

It is alleged in the complaint that plaintiffs (respondents here), their grantors and predecessors in interest, in the year 1858, constructed a dam and diverted the waters from Burch creek to lands then occupied by plaintiffs and their predecessors in interest. The quantity of land is alleged to be approximately 200 acres. It is further alleged that, since such diversion, the waters have been used on the lands originally occupied by plaintiffs and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Carey v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Big Cottonwood Tanner Ditch Co. v. ShurtliffUtah Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Rosenthyne v. Matthews-McCulloch Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1917
  4. United States v. CaldwellUtah Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Manti City Savings Bank v. PetersonUtah Supreme Court · 1908

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mitchell Irr. Dirstrict v. WhitingWyoming Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Daniels Irrigation Co. v. Daniel Summit Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Stevahn v. MeidingerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Stevahn v. MeidingerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API