Legal Opinion
Concerned Citizens v. Mayor
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided June 30, 2004PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
851 A.2d 685 (2004)
370 N.J. Super. 429
CONCERNED CITIZENS OF PRINCETON, INC., James Firestone, Herbert Hobler, Henry Landau, Mark J. Leuchten, Richard Strazza, and Herbert Tuchman, Plaintiffs-Appellants/Cross-Respondents,
v.
MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF the BOROUGH OF PRINCETON, Defendant-Respondent/Cross-Appellant.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued May 24, 2004.
Decided June 30, 2004.
R. William Potter, Princeton, argued the cause for appellants/cross-respondents (Potter and Dickson and Robert B. Zagoria, attorneys; Mr. Potter and Mr. Zagoria, on the brief).
Michael J. Herbert,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Jersey City Chapter of Property Owner's Protective Ass'n v. City Council of Jersey CitySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1969
- Wilson v. City of Long BranchSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
- Robbins v. City of JerseySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
- Borough of Princeton v. Bd. of Chosen Freeholders of Mercer Cty.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2001
- Schack v. TrimbleSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Gallenthin Realty Development, Inc. v. Borough of PaulsboroSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2007
- Harrison Redevelopment Agency v. DeRoseNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2008
- VINELAND CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. v. Township of PennsaukenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2007
- City of Midwest City v. House of Realty, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
- Rocky Hill Citizens v. Planning Bd. of Borough of Rocky HillNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2009
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.