Legal Opinion

Baumgartner v. Holslin

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 10, 1952No. 35,580PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Thomas Gallagher, Justice.

Action for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff while employed by defendant as a farm laborer on the latter’s farm in Stevens county. The jury returned a verdict in plaintiff’s favor for $3,500. Defendant appeals from the judgment entered thereon after denial of his motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial.

Defendant’s farm comprises 400 acres and has located thereon two 16 x 35-foot standard cement silos used for storing feed. About October 11, 1948, in the course of farming operations, defendant and plaintiff filled one of the described…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cook v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
  2. Nubbe v. Hardy Continental Hotel System of Minnesota, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
  3. Clark v. Banner Grain Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
  4. James v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  5. Dimetre v. Red Wing Sewer Pipe Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1914

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Conover v. Northern States Power Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  2. Miller v. MacAlester CollegeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
  3. Modjeski v. Atwell, Vogel & Sterling, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1969
  4. Stenvik v. ConstantCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
  5. Zimmer v. Carlton County Co-Op Power Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API