Legal Opinion

Martin v. LUKIE & FORNEY, INC.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 19, 1989No. 88-161PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

James "Spider" Martin, a Birmingham professional photographer, appeals from a summary judgment entered in favor of Luckie Forney, Inc., a Birmingham advertising agency, on his claims of loss of use and conversion. Martin alleged that Luckie Forney either lost or converted more than 100 photographic slides taken by Martin of the Alabama Symphony Orchestra ("ASO") between late 1984 and October of 1986.

By oral agreement with the ASO, Martin donated his photographic services to the symphony; he was reimbursed for expenses involved in photographing the ASO (cost of film, developing cost, etc.),…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bolling v. Kirby & BrotherSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  2. Clardy v. Capital City Asphalt Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  3. Conner & Johnson v. Allen & ReynoldsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1859
  4. Geneva Gin & Storage Co. v. RawlsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. SB v. Saint James SchoolSupreme Court of Alabama · 2006
  2. Economy Fire and Cas. Co. v. GoarSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  3. Thompson v. City of ClioDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1991
  4. Gardner v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2002
  5. White v. DrivasCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2006

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API