Legal Opinion
Foreman v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided August 25, 1927No. A-5908PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtEdwards, J.
The plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the district court of Sequoyah county for manslaughter in the first degree and was sentenced to serve a term of four years in the state penitentiary.
Only two assignments of error are argued in the brief: The first is that the court erred in permitting the state to impeach two of its own witnesses, Bertha Foutz and George Copeland. Bertha Foutz testified in substance that she had known both the deceased and the defendant for four or five years. That she was present when the homicide occurred. That deceased stopped where…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Sturgis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1909
- Culpepper v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1910
- Atchison v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1909
- Maynes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1912
- Paris v. United StatesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1911
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Leeks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1952
- Chambless v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1950
- Donahue v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1927
- Akins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1950
- Rowton v. KempSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.