Legal Opinion

Paris v. United States

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided May 9, 1911No. A-401PublishedCited by 14 opinions

A.ppeal from District Court, Marsh-all County; D, A. Richardson, Judge. Oscar Paris was convicted of manslaughter, and appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

DOYLE, Judge.

Upon the trial of this cause, Mrs. Lou Hartin was the only eyewitness to the killing introduced by the state. She testified to a clear case of self-defense upon the part of the appellant. For the purpose of impeaching her testimony, the state then introduced the following affidavit in evidence, which was admitted over the objection and exception of counsel for appellant:

'“Indian Territory, Southern District.

“Lou Hartin being duly sworn, on her oath deposes and says:

“ My name is Lou Hartin; my age is 20 years; I live about 1 % miles south of Madill, I. T. I knew J. W. McCarly in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sturgis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1909
  2. Culpepper v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1910

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Shepherd v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1931
  2. Foreman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1927
  3. Chambless v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1950
  4. Donahue v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1927
  5. Gillaspy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1953

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API