Legal Opinion

O'LEARY v. State

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided May 21, 1985No. C0-85-213PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FORSBERG, Judge.

Appellant appeals the trial court’s order denying his post-conviction motion for resentencing. Appellant asserts he was entitled to concurrent sentencing for his 1979 and 1981 convictions. We affirm.

FACTS

In 1979, appellant pled guilty to possession of a schedule II controlled substance. Imposition of sentence was stayed, and appellant was placed on probation for five years. During his probation, appellant committed an armed robbery. On April 6, 1981, he was sentenced to 75 months in prison for the robbery. On February 23, 1982, appellant’s probation for the 1979 offense…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bangert v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  2. State v. KlangSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  3. State v. MasterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  4. State v. O'LEARYCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. SchwabCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  2. Lallier v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  3. Lallier v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API