Legal Opinion

State v. O'LEARY

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided December 24, 1984No. C7-84-1476PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CRIPPEN, Judge.

Appellant Daniel O’Leary appeals from an order of the post-conviction court which denied his petition for resentencing under the Minnesota Sentencing Guidelines. We remand for specific findings of fact and conclusions of law.

FACTS

In 1979, appellant pleaded guilty in Scott County to possession of a schedule II con trolled substance. Imposition of sentence was stayed and appellant was placed on probation for five years. As condition of probation appellant participated in a chemical dependency treatment in Boulder, Colorado. About one year later appellant transferred to the…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Scruggs v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  2. O'LEARY v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  3. Piringer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API