Legal Opinion

Mahon v. Lackawanna & Wyoming Valley Railroad

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 8, 1938No. Appeal, 46PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Parker, J.,

Katie O’Donnell, widow of Prank O’Donnell, in an action under the Workmen’s Compensation Law, sought to recover compensation for the death of her husband. After the claim was filed the claimant died and her executrix was substituted as plaintiff. We are of the opinion that the deceased was at the time of his death engaged in interstate transportation. It follows that the Federal Employers’ Liability Act is applicable and that, as a consequence, recovery cannot be had under the state compensation law: New York Cent. R. Co. v. Porter, 249 U. S. 168, 169, 39 S. Ct. 188.

A…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Shanks v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Erie Railroad Company v. WinfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. Erie Railroad v. WelshSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  4. Industrial Accident Comm'n of Cal. v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  5. Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co. v. Di DonatoSupreme Court of the United States · 1921

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Scarborough v. Pennsylvania RailroadSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  2. Miller v. Lehigh Valley RailroadSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  3. Miller v. Lehigh Valley Rr. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API