Legal Opinion
Rabinowitz v. Wahrenberger
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided March 20, 2009No. A-1626-07T1PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
966 A.2d 1091 (2009)
406 N.J. Super. 126
Phyllis RABINOWITZ and Andrew Rabinowitz, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
Judith A. WAHRENBERGER, Esq., and Wahrenberger, Pietro & Sherman, LLP, Defendants-Respondents.
No. A-1626-07T1
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued January 13, 2009.
Decided March 20, 2009.
Bruce H. Nagel, argued the cause for appellant (Nagel Rice, attorneys; Mr. Nagel, on the brief).
Elliott Abrutyn, Livingston, argued the cause for respondent (Morgan Melhuish Abrutyn, attorneys; Mr. Abrutyn, of counsel and on the brief; Thomas G. Rantas, on the brief).
Before Judges WEFING,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hawkins v. HarrisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
- Russo v. NagelNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2003
- Devlin v. GreinerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
- Loigman v. TP. COMMITTEE OF MIDDLETOWNSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2006
- ZAGAMI, LLC v. CottrellNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2008
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Giles v. Phelan, Hallinan & Schmieg, L.L.P.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2012
- Rickenbach v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2009
- Kocontes v. McQuaidNebraska Supreme Court · 2010
- Quinlan v. Curtiss-Wright Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2009
- BELLO v. UNITED PAN AM FINANCIAL CORPORATIONDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2021
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.