Legal Opinion

Distassio v. American United Life Insurance

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 6, 1944PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCave, J.

— This suit is based on an alleged parol contract of life insurance on the life of Jennie Pitassi, daughter of plaintiff, for $1500, purporting to have been made by a representative of the defendant who had, or apparently had, the authority of a general agent. A jury was waived, trial by the court and finding and judgment for plaintiff in the sum of $2785, which included interest, penalties and attorneys’ fees. Motion for new trial overruled, and appeal perfected.

Defendant contends its demurrer to the evidence should have been sustained. The evidence concerning the parol contract is found in…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Slocum v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Flannagan v. Northwestern Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Virginia · 1929
  3. Gaines v. Berkshire Life InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1933
  4. Peoples Life Insurance v. ParkerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1942
  5. Lanowah Investment Co. v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1942

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Tietjens v. General Motors CorporationSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
  2. Dickinson v. Bankers Life & Casualty CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1955
  3. Baker v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1968
  4. Voss v. American Mutual Liability Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1960
  5. Baker v. McCue-Moyle Development Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1985

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API