Legal Opinion

Gammel v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 5, 1994No. CR 94-1214PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Ronald Wade Gammel was accused of drug offenses. His motion to dismiss for lack of a speedy trial was denied, and he filed a notice of appeal and attempted to lodge the record with this Court. The record eventually was filed after some difficulty concerning proper form.

Mr. Gammel now seeks a writ of certiorari to require the court reporter to put the record in proper form and assure that all necessary portions of the trial proceedings to date have been included. In his petition, he characterizes the proceeding here as “an interlocutory appeal pursuant to Rule 28.1(d), Ark. R. Crim. P.…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Richards v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  2. Prine v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
  3. Prine v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API