Legal Opinion · Dissent

Prine v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 7, 2007No. 07-10Published

1DissentJim Hannah, Chief Justice

I respectfully dissent. The writ should issue. The majority opinion does not cite Richards v. State, 338 Ark. 801, 2 S.W.3d 766 (1999); however, the decision in Richards was reached less than a month after the now overruled McFarland v. Lindsey, 338 Ark. 588, 2 S.W.3d 48 (1999), and clearly reveals the error in the present majority opinion. The court in Richards held as follows:

We adopted Ark. R. Crim. P. 28.1 for the purpose of enforcing the constitutional provisions requiring a speedy trial. Mackey v. State, 279 Ark. 307, 651 S.W.2d 769 (1994). Ark. R. Crim. P. 28.1(d) notes that motions…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Ussery v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
  2. State Ex Rel. Purcell v. NelsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1969
  3. MacKey v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
  4. Wooley v. State Farm Fire and Cas. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2005
  5. Gwin v. DanielsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API