Werner C. Von Clemm v. Roman Acosta Banuelos
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
COFFIN, Chief Judge,
Appellant began his long and arduous relationship with the Alien Property Custodian and the federal judicial system in the year 1941. 1 Since that time his case has been scrutinized by judges and administrators at epic length. It falls to us to decide whether he has received the consideration which is his due or whether another round of judicial examination is called for. We hold that review of the administrative decision under Section 32 of the Trading with the Enemy Act (the Act), 50 U.S.C.App. § 1 et seq. is foreclosed to the appellant; the district court properly…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Yakus v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Crowell v. BensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Calero-Toledo v. Pearson Yacht Leasing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Societe Internationale Pour Participations Industrielles Et Commerciales, S. A. v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- American Bank & Trust Co. v. Bond International Ltd.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2006