Legal Opinion

American Bank & Trust Co. v. Bond International Ltd.

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma

Decided August 4, 2006No. 06-CV-0317-CVE-FMHPublished

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

EAGAN, Chief Judge.

Now before the Court is Defendants’ Objection to Plaintiffs Motion to Appoint Receiver (Dkt.# 29). In their objection, defendants claim the Trading with the Enemy Act of 1917, 50 U.S.C. § 1, et seq. (“TWEA”), and the Cuban Assets Control Regulations, 31 C.F.R. § 515.101, et seq. (“CACR”), invalidate the security agreements held by American Bank and Trust Company (“American”) in collateral owned by defendants. 1 According to defendants, plaintiff is not likely to succeed in its request for the appointment of a receiver because the security agreement held by…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Schilling v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Central Union Trust Co. of NY v. GarvanSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  3. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc. v. Marilyn Kay Fernandez, Etc., Banco Nacional De Cuba, Defendants-Cross-Claimants-Appellees, Gilbert McDonaldCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
  4. Juan Rigores Sardino v. The Federal Reserve Bank of New York and the Secretary of the Treasury of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
  5. Freedom to Travel Campaign v. NewcombCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API