Pico v. Sepulveda
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the county of Los Angeles. The facts sufficiently appear in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
The Court.
In this case, after trial had, the court below, on the 23d of April, 1883, made and entered findings of fact, conclusions of law, and a decree in favor of the plaintiffs. Subsequently the defendant, Ranulfo Pico, moved “ for an amendment of the findings of fact, conclusions of law, and decree heretofore entered herein, as provided in section 473 of the Code of *337Civil Procedure, and section 35 of the Civil Code, and for a new trial.” The court heard the motion upon “ affidavits and counter-affidavits of the parties, as also the statement on motion for new trial, prepared and settled…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Harris v. San Francisco Sugar Refining Co.California Supreme Court · 1871
- Thompson v. WhiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
3Cited by8 opinions
- Stanton v. Superior Court of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- McKannay v. McKannayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- Hole v. TakekawaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Jones v. CloverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- Hawxhurst v. RathgebCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.