Legal Opinion

Knick v. Township of Scott

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 21, 2019No. 17-647Published

1ConcurrenceJustice Thomas

The Fifth Amendment's Takings Clause prohibits the government from "tak[ing]" private property "without just compensation." The Court correctly interprets this text by holding that a violation of this Clause occurs as soon as the government takes property without paying for it.

The United States, by contrast, urges us not to enforce the Takings Clause as written.

*2180It worries that requiring payment to accompany a taking would allow courts to enjoin or invalidate broad regulatory programs "merely" because the program takes property without paying for it. Brief for United States as Amicus Curiae…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Payne v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Arizonans for Official English v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API