Legal Opinion

Celisha Towers v. Michael Abbott, et al.

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided April 22, 2026No. 5:24-cv-04024Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS CELISHA TOWERS, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 24-4024-JAR-ADM MICHAEL ABBOTT, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Plaintiff Celisha Towers, proceeding pro se, filed this suit against nearly 80 defendants, alleging claims under

42 U.S.C. § 1983

and several other federal statutes. On August 29, 2025, the Court granted motions to dismiss 59 defendants for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, insufficient service, and/or failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.1 Today, the Court dismissed twelve more Defendants under…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API