Legal Opinion

Cunningham v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville & Davidson County

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided February 7, 1972PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ERBY L. JENKINS, Special Justice.

The complainant, Carl E. Cunningham, co-administrator of the estate of Robert Lloyd Williams, brought these actions in Part One of the Chancery Court of Davidson County seeking to compel the Metro politan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, hereinafter referred to as the defendant, to either satisfy two judgments rendered against the estate or to pay the estate the same amount, under the authority of Chapter 374, Public Acts of 1967, codified as § 6-640 T.C.A., which reads as follows:

“Whenever any employee member of a fire or police department…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Frye v. Bath Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1903
  2. Finley v. United States Casualty Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1904
  3. City of Chattanooga v. HarrisTennessee Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Associated Indemnity Corp. of San Francisco v. McAlexanderTennessee Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Gray v. HouckTennessee Supreme Court · 1934

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dixon v. HoldenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. City of Memphis v. RobertsTennessee Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Banks v. City of MasonTennessee Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Justice Steel, Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1980
  5. International Market and Restaurant, Inc. v. Belmont UniversityCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API