Siegel v. Insurance Co. of North America
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Per curiam
This is an action upon a policy of fire insurance. At the conclusion of the trial, both parties having moved for a directed verdict, the court discharged the jury and took the case under advise ment, thereafter filing a memorandum opinion and signing an- order for judgment in favor of the plaintiff. The appeal is from the judgment. The plaintiff was the owner of a store in the city of Bismarck, the stock consisting principally of men’s wearing apparel, including shoes. The stock was insured by the defendant company for $2,000 and there was $5,000 of other insurance. On February 22, 1926, a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- The Caledonian Fire Ins. Co. v. TraubCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1897
- Powers Dry Goods Co. v. Imperial Fire Ins.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- Boutross v. Palatine InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
- Swearinger Bros. v. Pacific Fire InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1896
- Broadway Insurance v. DoyingSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1893
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Siegel v. Ohio Millers' Mut. Fire Ins.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928