Legal Opinion

Siegel v. Insurance Co. of North America

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 1928PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

This is an action upon a policy of fire insurance. At the conclusion of the trial, both parties having moved for a directed verdict, the court discharged the jury and took the case under advise ment, thereafter filing a memorandum opinion and signing an- order for judgment in favor of the plaintiff. The appeal is from the judgment. The plaintiff was the owner of a store in the city of Bismarck, the stock consisting principally of men’s wearing apparel, including shoes. The stock was insured by the defendant company for $2,000 and there was $5,000 of other insurance. On February 22, 1926, a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. The Caledonian Fire Ins. Co. v. TraubCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1897
  2. Powers Dry Goods Co. v. Imperial Fire Ins.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  3. Boutross v. Palatine InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  4. Swearinger Bros. v. Pacific Fire InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1896
  5. Broadway Insurance v. DoyingSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1893

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Siegel v. Ohio Millers' Mut. Fire Ins.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API