Legal Opinion · Dissent

Greenbriar Hills Country Club v. Director of Revenue

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided March 20, 2001No. SC 82805Published

1DissentWolff, Judge

Section 536.087.11 allows attorneys’ fees and expenses in an action against the state “unless the court ... finds that the position of the state was substantially justified-” I believe that this Court’s decision in Greenbriar Hills Country Club v. Director of Revenue, 935 S.W.2d 36 (Mo. banc 1996), Greenbriar Hills I, which exempted the country club’s retail charges for meals and drinks from sales tax as not being sold to the public, was incorrect. Accordingly, the state’s position was substantially justified. I respectfully dissent.

Greenbriar Hills I purports to find, within the same section…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Greenbriar Hills Country Club v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1996
  2. St. Louis Country Club v. Administrative Hearing CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
  3. State Ex Inf. McKittrick v. Carolene ProductsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1940
  4. Westwood Country Club v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1999
  5. TERMINAL RR ASS'N v. City of BrentwoodSupreme Court of Missouri · 1950

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API