Legal Opinion

Pearce v. . House

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided July 5, 1817Published

1Opinion of the Court

The issue of Esias failed in 1772 by the death of his only daughter and heir at law, who had intermarried with the defendant, who had taken possession under her title, claiming as husband.

Ezekiel and David died before 1772. Simon Pearce, one of the lessors of the plaintiff, is the grandson and heir at law of Ezekiel, whose claim it is admitted is saved from the operation of the statute of limitations by the disabilities of himself and of those under whom he claims.

The other lessors are the heirs at law of David and Josiah. Soon after the issue of Esias became extinct, to wit, in October,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dobbins v. Dobbins.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  2. Clendenin v. ClendeninSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  3. Andrews v. . MulfordSuperior Court of North Carolina · 1796
  4. Parker v. . SuttonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
  5. Den Ex Dem. of McRee v. AlexanderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1827

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API