Legal Opinion

Andrews v. . Mulford

Superior Court of North Carolina

Decided May 5, 1796PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAYWOOD, J., only present. Will it not be proper to consider whether, if the act of limitations began to run from the time actual possession was taken (which is stated to have been in the lifetime of Mr. Waddle, the patentee, and about three years before he went to Europe) its operation can be suspended by his going beyond sea, or by his death, leaving infant heirs.

Counsel for the plaintiff: General Davie and myself have formerly considered of that question. It is a rule adopted only in the case of fines in England; it does not apply to the act of limitations.

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Dobbins v. Dobbins.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  2. Frisbee v. Town of MarshallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
  3. Cothran v. Akers Motor Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  4. Cobham v. . NeillSuperior Court of North Carolina · 1797
  5. Den on Demise of Tyrrell v. MooneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1810

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API