Legal Opinion

State v. Pierce

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 12, 2007No. 2007-1605Published

1Opinion of the Court

Cuyahoga App. No. 88470, 2007-Ohio-3665. Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law Nos. Ill and IV; cause held for the decision in 2006-2187, Hyle v. Porter, Hamilton App. No. C-050768, 170 Ohio App.3d 710, 2006-Ohio-5454; and briefing schedule stayed.

Moyer, C.J., and Lundberg Stratton, J., would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. Ill only. Pfeifer and O’Donnell, JJ., would also accept the appeal on all other Propositions of Law. Lanzinger, J., would also accept the appeal on Proposition of Law Nos. V and VI. Cupp, J., would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law Nos. I…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hyle v. PorterOhio Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. State v. Pierce, 88470 (7-19-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API