Legal Opinion

State v. LH

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 15, 2011No. A-31 September Term 2010, 066436Published

1Opinion of the Court

20 A.3d 1137 (2011)

206 N.J. 528

STATE of New Jersey, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

L.H., Defendant-Respondent.

Nos. A-31 September Term 2010, 066436

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued March 14, 2011.

Decided June 15, 2011.

Lucille M. Rosano, Special Deputy Attorney General/Acting Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for appellant (Carolyn A. Murray, Acting Essex County Prosecutor, attorney).

Alexander R. Shalom, Designated Counsel, argued the cause for respondent (Yvonne Smith Segars, Public Defender, attorney).

Carol M. Henderson, Assistant Attorney General, submitted a brief on behalf of amicus curiae…

Also in this document: Per curiam; Concurrence · Long; Concurrence · Rivera-Soto.

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. DiProspero v. PennSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
  2. State v. YarboughSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
  3. State v. BrownSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1990
  4. State v. MillerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2011
  5. State v. GelmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2008

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API