Legal Opinion

State v. Gelman

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided July 8, 2008PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Albin

A person found guilty of “engag[ing] in prostitution,” N.J.S.A. 2C:34-1(b)(1), is punishable as a disorderly person, “except that a second or subsequent conviction for such an offense constitutes a *478crime of the fourth degree,” N.J.S.A. 2C:34-1(c)(4) (emphasis added). With that law in mind, a Morris County grand jury returned an indictment charging defendant Janet Gelman with fourth-degree engaging in prostitution based, in part, on defendant’s prior petty disorderly persons conviction for prostitution under a differently-worded predecessor statute, L. 1978, c. 95, § 2C:34-1 (current version…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  2. United States v. BassSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. DiProspero v. PennSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
  4. McBoyle v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  5. State v. ReinerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2004

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. In Re Election Law Enforcement Commission Advisory Opinion No. 01-2008Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2010
  2. State v. ShelleySupreme Court of New Jersey · 2011
  3. State v. Kelvin Williams (071306)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2014
  4. State v. TwiggsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2018
  5. State v. RegisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2011

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API