The Upper Deck Company v. Panini America, Inc.
District Court, S.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 THE UPPER DECK COMPANY, a Case No.: 20cv185-GPC(KSC) Nevada corporation, 12 ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND Plaintiff, 13 DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S v. MOTION TO DISMISS 14 PANINI AMERICA, INC., 15 [Dkt. No. 12.] Defendant. 16 17 Before the Court is Defendant’s motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim under 18 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). (Dkt. No. 12.) Plaintiff filed an opposition and 19 Defendant replied. (Dkt. Nos. 16, 19.) Based on the reasoning below, the Court 20 GRANTS in part and…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Jones v. BockSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Moss v. U.S. Secret ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.