Legal Opinion

Santo v. Santo

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided July 11, 2016No. 89/15Published

1Opinion of the Court

Adam Santo v. Grace Santo, No. 89, September Term, 2015, Opinion by Adkins, J. FAMILY LAW — CHILD CUSTODY — JOINT LEGAL CUSTODY — TIE- BREAKING PROVISIONS: The court did not abuse its discretion in awarding the parties joint legal custody with tie-breaking provisions over several matters affecting their children. Although the parties lack the capacity to communicate or cooperate well, that factor is not a prerequisite under Taylor v. Taylor,

306 Md. 290

(1986) for a legally valid joint custody order. Moreover, trial courts in Maryland are legally authorized to use tie- breaking provisions in…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Eschbach v. EschbachNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Albright v. AlbrightMississippi Supreme Court · 1983
  3. In Re Adoption/Guardianship No. 3598Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  4. Ross v. HoffmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  5. Chaney v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API