Santo v. Santo
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
Adam Santo v. Grace Santo, No. 89, September Term, 2015, Opinion by Adkins, J. FAMILY LAW — CHILD CUSTODY — JOINT LEGAL CUSTODY — TIE- BREAKING PROVISIONS: The court did not abuse its discretion in awarding the parties joint legal custody with tie-breaking provisions over several matters affecting their children. Although the parties lack the capacity to communicate or cooperate well, that factor is not a prerequisite under Taylor v. Taylor,
306 Md. 290
(1986) for a legally valid joint custody order. Moreover, trial courts in Maryland are legally authorized to use tie- breaking provisions in…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Eschbach v. EschbachNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Albright v. AlbrightMississippi Supreme Court · 1983
- In Re Adoption/Guardianship No. 3598Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
- Ross v. HoffmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
- Chaney v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.