Legal Opinion

Aegon Insurance USA v. Durham-Gilpatrick

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided December 8, 2010No. CA 10-647Published

1Opinion of the Court

WAYMOND M. BROWN, Judge.

h The parties have been litigating DeAnn Durham-Gilpatrick’s entitlement to benefits since she suffered a compensable injury in February 1998. This time, they are contesting her entitlement to psychiatric treatment, which Durham-Gilpatrick claimed was causally related to her injury. The administrative law judge (ALJ) found that psychiatric treatment was reasonably necessary and causally related to her com-pensable injury. The Commission affirmed and adopted the ALJ’s opinion. Aegon Insurance USA and its carrier St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company (collectively…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing v. BakerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  2. Geo Specialty Chemical, Inc. v. ClinganCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2000
  3. Williams v. Prostaff TemporariesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  4. Parker v. Atlantic Research Corp.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2004
  5. Patchell v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2004

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API