Hoffman v. Lee Nashem Motors, Inc.
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtKeating, J.
George K. Hoffman and Margaretha Wilkens .commenced this action to recover sums of money owed to them '.by the defendants and evidenced by three promissory notes. 'The maker of each note is the corporate defendant, Lee Nashem "Motors, Inc. The indorser of each note is the individual .defendant, Leland Nashem.
Summary judgment on the notes in favor of the plaintiffs -was granted by Special Term. The Appellate Division (First Department) affirmed, one Justice dissenting.
The sole question on this appeal is whether the defendants "have raised a triable issue of fact, which should have precluded…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Jenkins v. MoyseNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
3Cited by15 opinions
- Strong v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1976
- Phillip J. McNellis Trustee of Donald S. Potter, Bankrupt, Individually and D/B/A Potter Real Estate Co. v. Isadore RaymondCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
- McNellis v. RaymondDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1968
- Buoninfante v. HoffmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
- Am-Elm Realty, Inc. v. StiversAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.