Hughes v. Bell
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Okmulgee County; Wade S. Stanfield, Judge. Action by R. H. Hughes and another against H. H. Bell and others. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiffs bring error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
COLLIER, C.
This suit was instituted by plaintiffs in error against defendants in error, to quiet their title to an undivided half interest in 80 acres of land described in the petition, and it is alleged that Lucy Fox was the owner of the other undivided half interest in said land. Hereinafter the parties will be designated as they were in the trial court. Defendants answered, setting up title to the whole of said. 80 acres of land in Sallie McCoy, subject to an oil and gas mining lease, which they allege was then owned by J. F. Paulter, Sherman Fleet-wood, Perry McKay, and H. H.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Jefferson v. CookSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- In re Estate of IngramCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Thompson v. CorneliusSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Lowrey v. Le FloreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Sweetland v. TransbergU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Washington · 1910
3Cited by13 opinions
- Estate of Pigeon v. StevensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Pitman v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1933
- In Re Estate of BrunerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
- Privett v. RentieSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- Ross v. WertzSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.