Legal Opinion

Guinter v. Williamsport

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 11, 1904No. Appeal, No. 233PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal, No. 233, Jan. T., 1903, by plaintiff, from judgment of C. P. Lycoming Co., June T., 1902, No. 114, on verdict for defendant in case of John L. Guinter v. City of Williamsport. ' Trespass to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by falling on a sidewalk. Before Hart, P. J. The facts appear by the opinion of the Supreme Court. Verdict and judgment for defendant. Plaintiff appealed.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 233, Jan. T., 1903, by plaintiff, from judgment of C. P. Lycoming Co., June T., 1902, No. 114, on verdict for defendant in case of John L. Guinter v. City of Williamsport. ' Trespass to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by falling on a sidewalk. Before Hart, P. J. The facts appear by the opinion of the Supreme Court. Verdict and judgment for defendant. Plaintiff appealed. Errors assigned were various instructions, and particularly (2) that the court failed to instruct the jury that the wire was a nuisance per se.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Dean,

The accident complained of occurred in broad daylight on the sidewalk on the south side of Lycoming street in the city of Williamsport being that side of the street on which plain.tiff had lived for ten or twelve years and over which he passed half a dozen times a day to and from his home. The street *589proper had. never been paved, nor was the sidewalk actually separated from the street by a line of curbstone although the demarcation between the two was noticeable. By an ordinance of the city there is laid upon the sidewalk a paving of stone five feet wide. The same…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dougherty v. . Village of HorseheadsNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
  2. Canavan v. City of Oil CitySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
  3. McArthur v. City of SaginawMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Raymond v. City of LowellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1850

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Foster Et Ux. v. West View Boro.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  2. Schaut v. St. Marys' BoroughSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  3. Boyd v. Kensington Water Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  4. Gillard v. City of ChesterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
  5. Farrell v. Plymouth BoroughSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1904

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API