Brown v. Ford Motor Co.
District Court, E.D. Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MORGAN, District Judge.
This matter came before the Court on the Plaintiffs Motion for a New Trial (“Plaintiffs Motion”). For the reasons set forth herein, the Court FINDS that a hearing is not necessary to address the Plaintiffs Motion. The Court further DENIES the Plaintiffs Motion and ORDERS that judgment be entered for the Defendant in accordance with the jury verdict rendered on June 2,1999.
I. Factual and Procedural History
On August 5, 1998, the Plaintiff, Sharin C. Brown (“Plaintiff’ or “Brown”), filed a Complaint which named Ford Motor Company, a Delaware corporation with its…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Tina BARRON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY OF CANADA LIMITED, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Peter J. Ricciardi v. The Children's Hospital Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
- Ruby Conway v. Chemical Leaman Tank Lines, Inc., the Fidelity & Casualty Company of New York, Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Estep v. Mike Ferrell Ford Lincoln-Mercury, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2009
- Bishop v. Takata Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
- Morgen v. Ford Motor Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 2003
- Morgen v. Ford Motor Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2002
- Huff v. ShumateDistrict Court, D. Wyoming · 2004
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.