Legal Opinion

People v. Monk

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 14, 1993PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The court erred in giving a "no inference” charge without defendant’s request (see, CPL 300.10 [2]). The error was harmless, however, because the evidence of guilt was overwhelming (see, People v Vereen, 45 NY2d 856, 857; People v Crimmins, 36 NY2d 230, 237). Defendant was found in the store after business hours. He had gained entry to the store through holes in the exterior wall and the ceiling. Cartons of cigarettes were found in a bag near the hole and quarters had been unwrapped and rearranged in the change drawer of the cash register. There is…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. CrimminsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. People v. VereenNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. People v. PulleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. ClarkeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  2. People v. DavisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API