People v. Howard
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
CHIPMAN, C.
Defendant was convicted of the crime of attempting to obtain money under false pretenses. He appeals from the judgment and from the order denying his motion for a new trial.
In January, 1899, the board of supervisors of Tulare County passed ordinance 67, offering a bounty of three cents for any squirrel killed or destroyed within that county. The ordinance required the claims to be supported by affidavit of certain facts, and also provided how and when the claims should be paid. The affidavit was to be accompanied by the tails of the squirrels claimed to have been killed. It is…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- People v. StanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
- People v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- People v. DefoorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- McCord v. . the PeopleNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- State v. CrowleyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1876
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- People v. WattsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- State v. MellenbergerOregon Supreme Court · 1939
- People v. OttermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- People v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906
- State v. ItoWashington Supreme Court · 1924
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.