Legal Opinion

Ray-O-Vac Co. v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided June 5, 1943No. 8118PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EVANS, Circuit Judge.

This appeal involves the validity and infringement of a patent to Anthony (assignor of plaintiff) -issued April 23, 1940, No. 2,198,423, and covering a “Leakproof Dry Cell.” The court found for the plaintiff on both issues, validity and infringement. From an injunctional decree, which also ordered an accounting, defendant prosecutes this appeal and renews the arguments made by it in the District Court in the hopeful belief that we will not agree with the conclusions which that court reached. While arguing both points, its most vigorous urge is directed to the defense of…

2Cited by13 opinions

  1. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Ray-O-Vac Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Zero Manufacturing Company, Inc. v. Mississippi Milk Producers AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
  3. Eversharp, Inc. v. Fisher Pen Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1961
  4. Holstensson v. Webcor, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1957
  5. The H. W. Gossard Co. v. J. C. Penney CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1962

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API